When should we opt for manual testing over automation testing?
Welcome to Manual Testing free training. In this tutorial, we will look at those scenarios/conditions where we need to opt for Manual testing over Automation testing. So, let’s start.
Automation testing is an important part of your software testing, but it has its limits. To go beyond the functional criteria of its works and into the user experience simulation, if it is worthwhile, you need to engage the human element.
The human element is manual software testing. It provides qualitative responses that lead to innovation and satisfaction, even though it lacks the speed-of-signal appeal of automation. In fact, we should not consider the two testing approaches as alternatives. It is significant to apply automation and manual testing correctly in your test plan.
When to opt for manual testing?
With manual testing, the tester can replicate the conditions under which your application will be used when it goes live. When the application is live, any bugs or glitches can be tracked thanks to manual testing.
UI & UX issues
Manual testing can help identify issues with the look and feel of the application. It also helps to uncover usability issues within the application. The automated tests can’t identify the loops in the application.
Manual testing does not require high-level skills or expensive tools to perform.
Ability to adapt to changes
When you make plenty of changes to the application and need to test it after implementing them, manual testing is a good option.
Tests That You Only Run Once
It doesn’t make much sense to automate tests when it needs to validate test scenarios and perform a few actions. If a non-recurring test requires an input of a large amount of data, it might be reasonable to automate it.
Features that are faster to be tested manually
If you need to test a small change, it would take time for coding and perform automation tools. The process could take more time than testing the feature manually.
But Manual testing has its problems.
Errors are possible.
As manual testing is performed by humans, there is a higher possibility of errors. The testing results will be as good as the testers’ ability to perform the tests. There is a chance that the tester misses out on the same bugs when testing the application.
Because manual tests cannot be reused, every time there is a change in the application, the tester will need to run all the test cases again. In the case of minor changes, the tester has to test the application. This is not a very time-saving activity.
Manual testing is not well-suited for load and performance testing. There is a requirement for many users and gadgets to check the performance of an application.
In short, there are some areas where Automation testing will not help like live testing, UI/UX, when you have less investment, or when you make plenty of changes to the application. But Manual testing has its own problems that should be in mind to plan to test an application.
To get more updates like this. Subscribe and stay tuned.
Happy learning 🙂